Henry Hazlitt cytaty

Henry Hazlitt Fotografia
5  0

Henry Hazlitt

Data urodzenia: 28. Listopad 1894
Data zgonu: 9. Lipiec 1993
Natępne imiona:헨리 해즐릿,هنری هزلیت

Reklama

Henry Stuart Hazlitt – amerykański dziennikarz, krytyk literacki, ekonomista, filozof. Przedstawiciel austriackiej szkoły ekonomicznej. Autor książki Ekonomia w jednej lekcji, w której między innymi przytacza opowieść o zbitej szybie.

Podobni autorzy

Karol Marks Fotografia
Karol Marks136
niemiecki filozof, ekonomista i działacz rewolucyjny
Waldemar Kuczyński Fotografia
Waldemar Kuczyński3
polski polityk, ekonomista
Winona LaDuke Fotografia
Winona LaDuke15
amerykańska działaczka praw Indian i ochrony środowiska
Henry George Fotografia
Henry George
amerykański ekonomista

Cytaty Henry Hazlitt

Reklama

„Inflacja to opium dla ludu.“

— Henry Hazlitt
Źródło: Henry Hazlitt, Ekonomia w jednej lekcji, Wydawnictwo Znak-Signum, Kraków 1993, ISBN 8370062814, s. 164.

Reklama

„Suppose a clothing manufacturer learns of a machine that will make men’s and women's overcoats for half as much labor as previously. He installs the machines and drops half his labor force.This looks at first glance like a clear loss of employment. But the machine itself required labor to make it; so here, as one offset, are jobs that would not otherwise have existed. The manufacturer, how ever, would have adopted the machine only if it had either made better suits for half as much labor, or had made the same kind of suits at a smaller cost. If we assume the latter, we cannot assume that the amount of labor to make the machines was as great in terms of pay rolls as the amount of labor that the clothing manufacturer hopes to save in the long run by adopting the machine; otherwise there would have been no economy, and he would not have adopted it.So there is still a net loss of employment to be accounted for. But we should at least keep in mind the real possibility that even the first effect of the introduction of labor-saving machinery may be to increase employment on net balance; because it is usually only in the long run that the clothing manufacturer expects to save money by adopting the machine: it may take several years for the machine to "pay for itself."After the machine has produced economies sufficient to offset its cost, the clothing manufacturer has more profits than before. (We shall assume that he merely sells his coats for the same price as his competitors, and makes no effort to undersell them.) At this point, it may seem, labor has suffered a net loss of employment, while it is only the manufacturer, the capitalist, who has gained. But it is precisely out of these extra profits that the subsequent social gains must come. The manufacturer must use these extra profits in at least one of three ways, and possibly he will use part of them in all three: (1) he will use the extra profits to expand his operations by buying more machines to make more coats; or (2) he will invest the extra profits in some other industry; or (3) he will spend the extra profits on increasing his own consumption. Whichever of these three courses he takes, he will increase employment.“

— Henry Hazlitt

Reklama

„I do not mean to suggest that all those who call themselves monetarists make this unconscious assumption that an inflation involves this uniform rise of prices. But we may distinguish two schools of monetarism. The first would prescribe a monthly or annual increase in the stock of money just sufficient, in their judgment, to keep prices stable. The second school (which the first might dismiss as mere inflationists) wants a continuous increase in the stock of money sufficient to raise prices steadily by a "small" amount—2 or 3 per cent a year. These are the advocates of a "creeping" inflation. … I made a distinction earlier between the monetarists strictly so called and the "creeping inflationists." This distinction applies to the intent of their recommended policies rather than to the result. The intent of the monetarists is not to keep raising the price "level" but simply to keep it from falling, i. e., simply to keep it "stable." But it is impossible to know in advance precisely what uniform rate of money-supply increase would in fact do this. The monetarists are right in assuming that in a prospering economy, if the stock of money were not increased, there would probably be a mild long-run tendency for prices to decline. But they are wrong in assuming that this would necessarily threaten employment or production. For in a free and flexible economy prices would be falling because productivity was increasing, that is, because costs of production were falling. There would be no necessary reduction in real profit margins. The American economy has often been prosperous in the past over periods when prices were declining. Though money wage-rates may not increase in such periods, their purchasing power does increase. So there is no need to keep increasing the stock of money to prevent prices from declining. A fixed arbitrary annual increase in the money stock "to keep prices stable" could easily lead to a "creeping inflation" of prices.“

— Henry Hazlitt

Natępna
Dzisiejsze rocznice
Boris Bieriezowski Fotografia
Boris Bieriezowski
rosyjski przedsiębiorca 1946 - 2013
Józef Glemp Fotografia
Józef Glemp23
polski duchowny katolicki, kardynał 1929 - 2013
Helmut Newton Fotografia
Helmut Newton
niemiecki fotografik 1920 - 2004
Następnych dzisiejszych rocznic
Podobni autorzy
Karol Marks Fotografia
Karol Marks136
niemiecki filozof, ekonomista i działacz rewolucyjny